Focus on fundamentals, not forecasts.
For much of the last century, investment success was often linked to foresight. The prevailing belief was that skilled investors could anticipate market cycles, economic inflection points, and policy shifts to stay ahead of the curve.
However, that paradigm is shifting. Today, markets are no longer guided solely by fundamentals such as interest rates or corporate earnings.
Instead, they are increasingly driven by fast-moving, unpredictable forces: a single tweet from a political leader, an unexpected regulatory change, or a sudden shift in public sentiment can move global markets in minutes.
In this environment, forecasting outcomes with consistency has begun to resemble speculation more than strategy. Political, ideological, and geo-political developments now unfold in real time and often without warning. Building portfolios based on what might happen next has become a high-risk, low-confidence exercise.
The standard disclaimer, “past performance is not indicative of future results”, has never felt more relevant.
Why relative performance is not a North Star
Despite the growing complexity of markets, many investors and managers still operate within a relative performance framework. Success is too often measured not by the absolute value created, but by how a portfolio compares to a benchmark or peer group.
This approach is increasingly misaligned with the needs of long-term investors. It encourages short-termism, herd behaviour, and risk-taking aimed more at outperforming others than at preserving capital or steadily compounding returns.
Short-term performance alone often tells an incomplete story. Strong results may be driven by timing, sentiment, or external events – factors that are rarely repeatable. A rally powered by momentum or favourable political developments may look impressive, but may not be sustainable over time.
In contrast, genuinely resilient returns come from businesses whose fundamentals endure across cycles. They come from understanding not just what performed well, but why – and whether it can be repeated.
By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail
In a world increasingly defined by uncertainty, the most useful question investors can ask is not, “What’s going to happen next?” but rather, “How prepared are we for whatever comes?”
Following Benjamin Franklin’s advice in the heading above, a different approach to portfolio construction is now required. Instead of trying to anticipate each twist in the market, investors should focus on building portfolios designed to withstand a wide range of possible outcomes.
It starts with owning the right kinds of businesses. High-growth, non-dividend-paying stocks, common in sectors such as AI or biotechnology, may deliver outsized returns in favourable conditions, but are often highly sensitive to swings in sentiment.
Similarly, commodity and resource stocks can add another layer of volatility, as they are closely tied to geopolitical tensions and fluctuating global demand. By contrast, companies that provide essential goods and services – such as consumer staples, utilities, and healthcare – tend to offer more stable cash flows and earnings.
Businesses with a track record of paying and growing dividends are particularly valuable, offering predictable income even in turbulent markets. These are the types of companies that form the backbone of resilient portfolios.
Resilience over prediction
In an unpredictable market environment, resilience matters more than foresight. Companies with steady cash flows and sustainable dividend growth have proven their ability to thrive across changing conditions and maintain a durable competitive edge.
While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither the writers of articles nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on information or recommendations contained herein. Our material is for informational purposes.